HISTORIC RESOURCE COMMISSION

MEETING MINUTES

Regular Meeting October 18, 2006

The regular meeting of the Coronado Historic Resource Commission was called to order at 3:11 p.m., Wednesday, October 18, 2006, at the Coronado City Hall Council Chambers, 1825 Strand Way, Coronado, California, by Chairperson Keith.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith, and Wilson.

MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

STAFF PRESENT: Ann McCaull, Associate Planner

Martha L. Alvarez, Recording Secretary

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

The minutes of October 4, 2006 were approved as submitted.

DIRECTOR’S REPORT

Ms. McCaull reported that a permit was issued today for a new porch and balcony addition at 1132 Isabella Avenue. The addition is occurring along the front façade of the property but the majority of the dwelling is being preserved. Although this is a prominent site, staff has determined that the structure is not 75 years of age.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND OTHER MATTERS

Kevin Rugee, 1024 Isabella Avenue, gave an update on the project he designed for John and Ann Wright at 1117 G Avenue. The Wrights have received a photograph of their home which appears to have been taken about 1950. It depicts the home before the front porch was enclosed. The Wrights would like to re-incorporate the enclosed front porch into the proposed design. This will bring unification to the three homes by each of the homes having a set of columns which will look like part of the original design.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

HR 16-06 VALERIE AND GREG HEBERT – Request for Historic Designation of the single family residence addressed as 1027 Adella Avenue and located in the R-1A (Single Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. This site contains a single story dwelling and detached garage on a 6,000 square foot lot. The owners have applied for historic designation to preserve and protect the home for the present and for the future. Several other homes within the vicinity have been designated historic resources including 1005 / 1013 / 1015 / 1022 / 1033 / 1060 Adella Avenue, and 1504 Glorietta Boulevard. The owners are hopeful that this area could become the first Historic District within Coronado. This home was constructed in 1923 so the residence is 83 years old. Oral testimony indicates that Zoe Brooks was the original owner and L.R. Dilley was the contractor. The current owners indicate that Zoe Brook’s son, 92-year-old Tom Brooks, provided information to them that Chris Cosgrove was the builder. The home has remained unaltered since its original construction in terms of exterior changes. The current owners remodeled the kitchen, existing bathroom and added an additional bathroom in 2004. However, all work occurred within the existing footprint of the dwelling. The owners feel that the structure is historically significant due to its unique architectural style which is a Spanish Colonial Revival; its builder, Chris Cosgrove; and for the current owner’s grandmother, Abigail Dickson, who resided in the home. Ms. Dickson was a forensic psychologist who specialized in interviewing suspects involved in violent crimes. She was involved in San Diego’s judicial system for over 30 years. Her most notable cases included the double homicide by the Harris brothers in 1978, which resulted in the execution of Alton Harris in 1992, and the Sagon Penn case in 1986 when he was acquitted for the murder of a San Diego police officer.

The applicants, Greg and Valerie Hebert, were present in the audience.

arr

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no members of the audience wishing to speak at this time.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Commissioner Draper said she was intrigued by L.R. Dilley. In November of 1923, the Coronado Journal listed on a monthly basis building permits that were issued. There was a building permit issued for October of 1923 which read as follows: “Residence erected at 474 A Avenue, Owner: Howard E. Haines, Contractor: L. Dilley, Cost: $6,500.” Ms. Draper concluded that Mr. Dilley was not a laborer.

Greg and Valerie Hebert, 1027 Adella Avenue, said they met with the owners of an historic home in Mission Hills. The owners were researching R. Dilley as their builder or architect and were able to share information about the Heberts’ home which was collected by historian Ron May.

COMMISSION ACTION

COMMISSIONER DRAPER MADE A MOTION THAT THE HISTORIC RESOURCE COMMISSION WOULD CONSIDER 1027 ADELLA AVENUE (HR 16-06) TO BE AN HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROPERTY AND WOULD APPROVE A REQUEST FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION IF REQUESTED, WITH THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION STATING THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

A. IT DOES EXEMPLIFY OR REFLECT SPECIAL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY’S MILITARY, CULTURAL, SOCIAL AND ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY;

B. IT IS IDENTIFIED WITH PERSONS SIGNIFICANT IN LOCAL HISTORY IN THAT CHRIS COSGROVE WAS A PROMINENT BUILDER WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AND THE PREVIOUS OWNER, ABIGAIL DICKSON PH.D, WAS A FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST WHO WAS INVOLVED IN SAN DIEGO’S JUDICIAL SYSTEM FOR OVER 30 YEARS AND HER MOST NOTABLE CASES INCLUDED THE DOUBLE HOMICIDE BY THE HARRIS BROTHERS IN 1978 AND THE SAGON PENN CASE IN 1986.;

C. IT IS ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING EXAMPLES IN THE CITY POSSESSING DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SPANISH COLONIAL REVIVAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, AND IS VALUABLE FOR THE STUDY OF A TYPE, PERIOD, OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION WITH THE ROCKCRETE STUCCO FINISH AND HAS NOT BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED.

D. IT IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NOTABLE WORK OF A BUILDER CHRIS COSGROVE AND DEVELOPER MR. DILLEY.

COMMISSIONER WILSON SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed 4-0.

Chairperson Keith announced that this is the 90^th home to be designated historic.

HR 17-06 JOHN AND VIRGINIA TURPIT – Request for Historic Designation of the single family residence addressed as 740 J Avenue and located in the R-1A (Single Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. The Turpits have owned the property since 1993. The site contains a two-story single family residence and a detached garage. The site is about 7,000 square feet. The owners have applied for designation to preserve the residence. City records indicate the home was built in 1928 so the residence is 78 years old. The owner was identified as Mrs. Austin and the contractor was Chris Cosgrove. Some alterations have occurred to this building since its original construction. Repairs occurred in 1930 and a porch was constructed in 1932. In 1952, a permit was issued for a sunroom to the dwelling and a bathroom was added in 1962. In 1993, Mr. and Mrs. Turpit remodeled the residence and completed a second story addition, which totals about 341 square feet. This addition occurred at the south elevation on the front façade at the second level. The window on the first story of the residence was changed to French doors. The application indicates there have been only three owners of this property since its original construction. Mrs. Austin owned the property until 1944. Admiral Arnold purchased the site until 1993 when John and Virginia Turpit acquired the dwelling. The owner indicates the structure is historically significant for representing the California Mission architectural style. Distinctive characteristics of the structure include the arched front door believed to be the only one in Coronado; the exposed decorative 8 X 8 wood beams carrying the cantilevered second story over the entry; and the decorative open stucco finish, red tile roof with overhangs. Chris Cosgrove was the contractor, a noted builder within the community who constructed several homes between 1910 and 1940’s.

John Turpit, 1038 G Avenue, thanked the Commission for their consideration, and made himself available to answer any questions.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this time.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Commissioner Wilson said it is a wonderful home and deserved to be designated historic.

Commission Herron agreed.

Commissioner Draper likes the fact that the front yards in this block connect without any walls.

COMMISSION ACTION

COMMISSIONER WILSON MADE A MOTION THAT THE HISTORIC RESOURCE COMMISSION WOULD CONSIDER 740 J AVENUE (HR 17-06) TO BE A HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROPERTY AND WOULD APPROVE A REQUEST FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION IF REQUESTED, WITH THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION STATING THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

IT DOES EXEMPLIFY OR REFLECT SPECIAL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY’S MILITARY, CULTURAL, SOCIAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY;
IT IS IDENTIFIED WITH PERSONS SIGNIFICANT IN LOCAL HISTORY FOR CHRIS COSGROVE THE NOTED BUILDER, AND PREVIOUS OWNERS ADMIRAL ARNOLD AND MRS. AUSTIN;
IT IS ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING EXAMPLES IN THE CITY POSSESSING DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CALIFORNIA MISSION ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, AND IS VALUABLE FOR THE STUDY OF A TYPE, PERIOD, OR METHOD INCLUDING THE ARCHED DOORWAY, AND HAS NOT BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED.
IT IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NOTABLE WORK OF CHRIS COSGROVE, WHO WAS A PROMINENT BUILDER WITHIN CORONADO FROM 1910 THROUGH THE 1940’S.

COMMISSIONER HERRON SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith, and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed 4-0.

Chairperson Keith announced that this is the 91^st home to be designated historic.

HR 18-06 JOHN AND VIRGINIA TURPIT – Request for Historic Designation of the single family residence addressed as 1038 G Avenue and located in the R-1A (Single Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. The Turpits have owned the property since 2003. It contains a two story dwelling and attached garage. The site contains about 4,000 square feet. The original home was constructed in 1924 so the home is 82 years old. Mrs. Chas Jennings was the owner at that time and J.E. Alcarez was the builder. No other alterations occurred to the structure until 2003, when the Turpits acquired the property and undertook a major restoration project to the home along with a second story addition. The second story addition totaled about 1,300 square feet. The application indicates the home is historically significant for representing the Craftsman Bungalow architectural style. The Historic Resource Inventory completed in the 1980’s gave this home an historical value rating of 4H. A rating of 4 indicated the structure was in fair physical condition and had modifications to the original exterior appearance. The property may have been in poor condition in the 1980’s. It is important to note that it was given a rating of H, which indicates that the Coronado Historical Association had identified this structure as historically significant. The last feature that may make this home significant is the contractor, Mr. Alcarez, who was a noted builder within the community in the 1920’s.

John Turpit, 1038 G Avenue, gave an overview of the request, displayed photographs, and made himself available to answer any questions.

Commissioner Draper asked if the architectural style is a Ranch or Craftsman Bungalow.

Ms. McCaull said that according to the Historic Resource Inventory, it was referred to as a Spanish Bungalow.

Mr. Turpit said he considers it a Craftsman style.

PUBLIC COMMENT

John O’Brien, 1140 Coronado Avenue, commented on the long list of homes pending Mills Act and opined on what criteria should be used to prioritize homes.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Chairperson Keith said this home will be a great addition to the historic resource.

Commissioner Draper agreed and said it was a wonderful home.

COMMISSION ACTION

COMMISSIONER HERRON MADE A MOTION THAT THE HISTORIC RESOURCE COMMISSION WOULD CONSIDER 1038 G AVENUE (HR 18-06) TO BE A HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROPERTY AND WOULD APPROVE A REQUEST FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION IF REQUESTED, WITH THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION STATING THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

IT DOES EXEMPLIFY OR REFLECT SPECIAL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY’S CULTURAL, ECONOMIC, AESTHETIC, AND ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY;
IT IS ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING EXAMPLES IN THE CITY POSSESSING DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CRAFTSMAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WITH GUM WINDOWS, AND IS VALUABLE FOR THE STUDY OF A TYPE, PERIOD, OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE RESIDENCE TO COMPLEMENT THE ORIGINAL DWELLING; AND
IT IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NOTABLE WORK OF J.E. ALCAREZ WHO WAS A NOTED BUILDER WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

CHAIRPERSON KEITH SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith, and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed 4-0.

Chairperson Keith announced that this is the 92^nd home to be designated historic.

HAP 10-06 JOE AND CAYLEE PINSONNEAULT – Request for Historic Alteration Permit for minor alterations and addition to the historically designated property addressed as 941 J Avenue and for the construction of a replacement dwelling at the rear of the property including a request for exceptions to zoning standards for the site located in the R-1A (Single Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. This residence was designated as an Historic Resource on September 6, 2006. When alterations are proposed to an historic structure, it returns before the Commission for review. It should also be noted there is an existing dwelling at the rear of the property. The Commission recently authorized the demolition of that structure finding it did not meet the criteria to be deemed historic. The owners are planning interior restoration work and remodeling to the historically designated home. There is also a single story addition that is proposed along the south elevation of the property. Along the south property, the home has a zero setback. With the addition, the owner is requesting a zero setback. Along the front is an existing driveway and curb cut. The curb cut is proposed to be closed and re-landscaped. At the rear of the property, a replacement dwelling is proposed for the existing residence. The dwelling is proposed to be located above a three-car garage and would contain 815 square feet. It would be consistent in architectural style with the front home. Along with the new dwelling unit, the owners are requesting exceptions to the Code. Normally, the rear yard setback requirement would be 36 feet for the second story; they are proposing a 5 foot setback. The new Carriage House Ordinance allows for two-story structures at the rear of the property to only have a 5 foot setback. A Carriage House typically would not be a dwelling unit but in terms of mass and bulk, it would not be too obtrusive to adjoining properties. The rear structure would also be slightly larger than the size of a Carriage House that would be permitted. The owners are also proposing balconies which will look down into the yard, which the Carriage House Ordinance would not allow. Staff is concerned with privacy issues with regard to the neighbors.

Commissioner Draper asked what the difference is between a Carriage House and a dwelling.

Ms. McCaull clarified that the owners are proposing a dwelling unit and not a Carriage House. A Carriage House is simply a guest quarter. It cannot be rented out separately and cannot contain a kitchen. The owners are proposing a replacement dwelling for the existing home at the rear of the property.

Commissioner Draper asked if the dwelling could be rented out.

Ms. McCaull responded yes.

Chairperson Keith asked if the Commission would be giving an exemption to the zoning regulations to allow a second dwelling on the property.

Ms. McCaull said there already exists a second dwelling unit on the property.

Chairperson Keith asked if the second dwelling unit has been demolished.

Ms. McCaull said that it has not been demolished yet. The owner is proposing to replace the existing dwelling with a new dwelling.

Chairperson Keith asked if the owners are asking for relief from the current zoning for two separate addresses.

Ms. McCaull said the owners do not need a relief from that because there are already two separate addresses. The owners are asking for relief to allow the increased second story setback.

Chairperson Keith said that it used to be that when there was a non conforming inconsistency with the zoning ordinance, it was grandfathered. However, if it is not being used as a rental unit, the non conforming grandfathered clause would not apply. Does this still apply?

Ms. McCaull said that is correct. However, with this historically designated property, it is being viewed as a reconstruction. It is not an increase in non conformity. They are maintaining the existing non conformities on the site. Additionally, they are improving conditions because they are providing additional parking.

Chairperson Keith asked if they were discussing a non historic structure.

Ms. McCaull said the site has been designated historic.

Kevin Rugee, 1024 Isabella Avenue, gave an overview of the request and presented a design plan.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this time.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Commissioner Draper said she really liked the idea of not increasing the mass of the front house because there are so many large mansions in town. She also likes the idea that the driveways will be removed and the area will be landscaped. In addition, she feels that the balconies look better than the windows. She has no issues with the setback.

Commissioner Herron agreed. She feels that the front house is in scale with the neighborhood.

Commissioner Wilson said she has an issue with the rear structure and the separate addresses. She does not feel it is in the Commission’s purview to consider a non historic structure.

Chairperson Keith agreed and said she feels that the front house should be their only consideration.

Ms. McCaull clarified that the site has been deemed historic. A discretionary permit has been requested. Since the property has been designated historic, there is latitude. The Planning Department is supporting the Commission decision.

Commissioner Draper said that the original request by the owner was to demolish the entire property. The front structure has been deemed historic so she is willing to work with the owner on this unique request.

Mr. Rugee clarified that there have always been two separate addresses and although this one-time request is unique, there are many benefits associated with this request. He feels that the Commission has the opportunity to help retain some of the character and heritage of the community and their decision is being supported by the Planning Department.

COMMISSION ACTION

COMMISSION HERRON MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE HAP 10-06 HISTORIC ALTERATION PERMIT, AS SUBMITTED.

THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS WERE MADE:

A. THAT THE PROPOSED ALTERATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THIS CHAPTER, THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT AND THE GENERAL PLAN.

B. THE PROPOSED ALTERATION WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HISTORICAL, ARCHITECTURAL OR AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCE.

C. THE PROPOSED ALTERATION WILL RETAIN THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS THAT MAKE THE HISTORIC RESOURCE SIGNIFICANT.

D. THE PROPOSED ALTERATION WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HISTORIC RESOURCE’S RELATIONSHIP TO ITS SURROUNDINGS AND NEIGHBORING HISTORIC RESOURCES.

E. THE PROPOSED ALTERATION WILL COMPLY WITH THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR’S STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT OF 1966.

COMMISSIONER DRAPER SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith, and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed with a vote of 4-0.

HRPA 8-06 GEORGE WILEY – Request for a Historic Preservation Mills Act Agreement for the future property owner of the historically designated residence addressed as 1043 Ocean Boulevard and located in the R-1A (Single Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. On October 4, 2006, the Commission designated the property as an historic resource with the condition, as requested by the property owner, that the designation would be contingent upon a future property owner obtaining a Mills Act Agreement. The Mills Act agreement is not an automatic entitlement to a property owner rather each agreement is evaluated on its own merits for the historical significance of a property and need for improvements and or restoration work. This Mills Act application is being filed on behalf of a future property owner who is in escrow to purchase the site and has made the purchase contingent upon receiving a Mills Act Agreement from the City in the near future. This is a unique situation because the applicant is requesting that the Commission forward to the City Council a recommendation regarding the Mills Act itself. It is important to note that while the entire property would be designated historic, staff is recommending that the only portion of the property eligible to receive the Mills Act Agreement would be the front home.

Scott Aurich, 1037 Loma Avenue, said the prospective buyer does not have a list of future possible alterations at this time, only a deferred maintenance list.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no members of the public wishing to speak.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Commissioner Wilson said that she never thought that the Mills Act would automatically apply for tax break reasons. In this case, it is a fabulous house at a fabulous price and it would not appear that the new owners would absolutely need the tax break in order to do the work.

Chairperson Keith said that if someone applies for historic designation, they then qualify to apply for a Mills Act. She sees the two going hand in hand.

Commissioner Herron agreed and said it was a logical step.

Commissioner Draper said that whether an applicant has a special dispensation or whether they have a regular Mills Act Agreement granted, the list of future improvements (within next 10 years) should be listed before it is forwarded to City Council.

Commissioner Wilson clarified that she has an issue with automatically assuming that everyone who receives a Mills Act receives tax benefits.

Ms. McCaull agreed with Commissioner Draper and asked the applicant’s representative to read in the record the deferred maintenance list.

Mr. Aurich summarized the list as follows:

1. Sitework: demolition, utilities, drainage;

2. Concrete;

3. Masonry: Fireplaces;

4. Metals: Replace rail system;

5. Woods and plastics: Rough carpentry;

6. Thermal and Moisture Protection: Below grade waterproofing, roofing;

7. Doors, windows, Skylights: Replacement windows, weather-stripping, garage skylights;

8. Finishes: Tiles, painting;

9. Specialties: Fireplace accessories;

10. Mechanical: Rough plumbing, equipment, HVAC;

11. Electrical.

Chairperson Keith said she has no issues recommending this item to the City Council.

Commissioner Draper asked if the annual cap amount would be reduced if this special request is granted by the City Council.

Ms. McCaull said she expects it will be treated as a special exception and would not be included as part of the annual cap.

COMMISSION ACTION

CHAIRPERSON KEITH MADE A MOTION TO FORWARD THE HISTORIC RESOURCE PRESERVATION AGREEMENT APPLICATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE APPROVED LIST OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FRONT PROPERTY AT 1043 OCEAN BOULEVARD (HRPA 8-06) AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL MAINTENANCE OF THE RESIDENCE, AND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER THIS ITEM AS A “SPECIAL EXCEPTION” TO THE MILLS ACT PROGRAM AND FISCAL CAP, AND THAT THE SAME CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO THE REMAINING 24 AGREEMENT APPLICATIONS.

COMMISSIONER WILSON SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron Keith, and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed 4-0.

NOI 12-06 TERRANCE AND MICHELLE BUCKLEW: – Notice of Intent to Demolish the single family residence addressed as 454 D Avenue and located in the R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. The Bucklews have owned the property since 1997. The site contains a two-story dwelling and a detached garage. The property is 3,500 square feet. If the structure is demolished, two dwelling units could be constructed on this site. City records indicate this home was constructed in 1926 so it is 80 years old. The owner at that time was Mary Tritt and the contractor of record was A. Laing. In 1975, a permit was issued for the construction of a two car garage with an attached bathroom. The owner and contract for these improvements was P. Wilson Jr. In 1975, a subsequent permit was issued for the construction of a second story addition to the residence. Dormers were added at the front of the building, the front façade was altered, and it appears substantial modifications occurred to the original structure. The owner and builder for these improvements was C.L. Raaka. The application notes that while the original home is 80 years old, the second story addition is only 30 years old and substantially altered the residence. The application also notes this is a Craftsman style home; fair to good condition but has required many repairs over the last several years. Alfred Laing was a noted builder in Coronado and constructed over 250 homes within the community.

The applicant’s representative, Andrew Alldredge, 761 G Avenue, made himself available to answer questions.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Luis Siemen, owner of 450 D Avenue, had no objection to the demolition request, however, he was concerned with future construction at the subject site.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Commissioner Draper said she had no issues with granting the demolition permit as the home does not meet the criteria to be designated historic.

Commissioner Wilson said the property has been substantially altered and is not worthy of an historic designation.

Commissioner Herron agreed.

COMMISSION ACTION

COMMISSIONER HERRON MADE A MOTION THAT THE HISTORIC RESOURCE COMMISSION MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT THE STRUCTURE ADDRESSED AS 454 D AVENUE (NOI 12-06) DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA TO BE DESIGNATED AN HISTORIC RESOURCE, WITH THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION STATING THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

THE PROPERTY DOES MEET THE 75-YEAR AGE REQUIREMENT;

A. IT DOES NOT EXEMPLIFY OR REFLECT SPECIAL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY’S MILITARY, CULTURAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, POITICAL, AESTHETIC, ENGINEERING, OR ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY;

B. IT IS NOT IDENTIFIED WITH A PERSON(S), OR AN EVENT(S) SIGNIFICANT IN LOCAL, STATE, OR NATIONAL HISTORY;

C. IT IS NOT ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING EXAMPLES IN THE CITY POSSESSING DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, AND IS NOT VALUABLE FOR THE STUDY OF A TYPE, PERIOD, OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION AND HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED;

D. IT IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NOTABLE WORK OF A BUILDER ALFRED LAING, HOWEVER AT THIS TIME HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED;

E. IT DOES NOT MEET THE STATE PROGRAM OF LANDMARKS AND POINTS OF HISTORICAL INTEREST AS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE 2 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 50280) OF CHAPTER 1 OF PART 1 OF DIVISION 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE AND ARTICLE 9 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 439) OF CHAPTER 3 OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE (AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME).

CHAIRPERSON KEITH SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith, and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed 4-0.

There is a 10-day appeal period.

NOI 13-06 MORRIS, ROTHENBURG, WEISBARTH FLP: – Notice of Intent to Demolish the single family residence addressed as 855 G Avenue and located in the R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. This site contains a single story residence and the property totals 7,000 square feet. If the structure is demolished, four dwellings could be constructed on this site. City records indicate the home was constructed in 1922 so the residence is 84 years old. There have been a few repairs and alterations to the home. The application notes that the home has been vacant since 1994. The vacant dwelling was recently in violation of the Vacant Premise Ordinance and was reported to the Code Enforcement Officer as a violation through the Coronado Police Department. The dwelling was boarded up and the grounds were secured with fencing by the owner’s representative.

The applicant, Doug Weisbarth, 915 Pomona, said the home belonged to his father-in-law. The structure is deteriorated and not habitable.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this time.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Commissioner Wilson said she had no issues approving the demolition request. She did not feel the structure was worthy of historic designation.

COMMISSION ACTION

COMMISSIONER WILSON MADE A MOTION THAT THE HISTORIC RESOURCE COMMISSION MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT THE STRUCTURE ADDRESSED AS 855 G AVENUE (NOI 13-06) DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA TO BE DESIGNATED AN HISTORIC RESOURCE, WITH THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION STATING THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

THE PROPERTY DOES MEET THE 75-YEAR AGE REQUIREMENT;

A. IT DOES NOT EXEMPLIFY OR REFLECT SPECIAL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY’S MILITARY, CULTURAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, POITICAL, AESTHETIC, ENGINEERING, OR ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY;

B. IT IS NOT IDENTIFIED WITH A PERSON(S), OR AN EVENT(S) SIGNIFICANT IN LOCAL, STATE, OR NATIONAL HISTORY;

D. IT IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NOTABLE WORK OF A BUILDER, DESIGNER, ARCHITECT, ARTISAN OR LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONA;

COMMISSIONER WILSON SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith, and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed 4-0.

There is a 10-day appeal period.

NOI 14-06 J.D. DUDEK: – Notice of Intent to Demolish the single family residences addressed as 861-863 B Avenue and located in the R-1B (Single Family Residential) Zone.

Ms. McCaull introduced the staff report as outlined in the agenda. This site contains two detached single story dwellings and an accessory building. The parcel totals about 4,791 square feet. It is currently legal non conforming since only one dwelling would be permitted for the parcel. It should be noted that the adjoining property is also owned by Mr. Dudek and the Commission authorized the demolition of two houses on this property in January 2006. The two sites combined total about 10,641 square feet and if a boundary adjustment was processed, a total of three dwellings could be constructed on the entire property owned by Mr. Dudek. City records indicate the structures were constructed in 1910 so they are 96 years old. The owner for both residences was David Chapin and the contractor was L. Dilley. Mr. Dilley was also the contractor for the two homes on the adjoining properties previously reviewed the by the Commission. The application notes that the homes represent a Craftsman/bungalow architectural style but do not meet any of the other criteria to be deemed an historic resource.

J.D. Dudek, 848 D Avenue, said he just acquired the home from his sister. He would be willing to restore the home but the foundation is severely deteriorated and the home is not functional for modern living.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Valerie Hebert, 1027 Adella Avenue, said the home has a lot of street appeal. She understands that Mr. Dudek does not consider the home to be livable. She had to rebuild her home and although there is much work involved, it is not impossible.

COMMISSION DISCUSSION

Commissioner Wilson said she had no issues approving the demolition request. She did not feel the structure has any historic significance.

Commissioner Herron agreed.

Chairperson Keith said she had no issues approving the demolition request.

COMMISSION ACTION

COMMISSIONER DRAPER MADE A MOTION THAT THE HISTORIC RESOURCE COMMISSION MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT THE STRUCTURES ADDRESSED AS 861-863 B AVENUE (NOI 14-06) DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA TO BE DESIGNATED AN HISTORIC RESOURCE, WITH THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION STATING THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

THE PROPERTY DOES MEET THE 75-YEAR AGE REQUIREMENT;

A. IT DOES NOT EXEMPLIFY OR REFLECT SPECIAL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY’S MILITARY, CULTURAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, POITICAL, AESTHETIC, ENGINEERING, OR ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY;

B. IT IS NOT IDENTIFIED WITH A PERSON(S), OR AN EVENT(S) SIGNIFICANT IN LOCAL, STATE, OR NATIONAL HISTORY;

D. IT IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NOTABLE WORK OF A BUILDER ALFRED LAING, HOWEVER AT THIS TIME HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED;

A CONDITION WAS ADDED THAT THE OWNER SHALL PRESERVE THE TWO TREES AT THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY.

COMMISSIONER WILSON SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: Commissioners Draper, Herron, Keith, and Wilson.

NAYS: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner MacCartee.

ABSTAIN: None.

The motion passed 4-0.

There is a 10-day appeal period.

MISCELLANEOUS

None.

DISCUSSION ITEMS

Discussion regarding the Historic Preservation Newsletter (no report).

The deadline for the Commission’s newsletter to be submitted to the City Manager’s office for inclusion in the Coronado Currents is December 1, 2006.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:49 p.m.

Tony A Peña

Director of Community Development